Table Of Contents:
Preface xxvii
Acknowledgments xxix

Introduction To Evidence Law 1(16)

Good News and Bad News 2(3)

The Nature and Development of Evidence Law 5(3)

The Anglo-American Trial 8(4)

The Role of the Trial Judge 12(5)

The Trial Judge's Authority 12(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 104(a) 12(1)

The Trial Judge's Discretion 13(1)

Roger C. Park, David P. Leonard & Steven H. Goldberg, Evidence Law 13(1)

Steven A Saltzburg, Michael M. Martin & Daniel J. Capra, Federal Rules of Evidence Manual 13(1)

United States v. Walton 14(1)

Bandera v. City of Quincy 14(3)

Relevance 17(26)

Relevance and Irrelevance 17(7)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 401 18(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.R. 402 19(1)

Knapp v. State 19(1)

United States v. Dominguez 20(1)

State v. Larson 21(1)

Edmund M. Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence 22(1)

Graham C. Lilly, An Introduction to the Law of Evidence 23(1)

Probative Value and Prejudice 24(14)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 403 24(1)

Eleanor Swift, One Hundred Years of Evidence Law Reform: Thayer's Triumph 25(1)

United States v. Noriega 26(1)

United States v. Flitcraft 27(1)

Abernathy v. Superior Hardwoods, Inc. 28(1)

United States v. McRae 29(1)

Old Chief v. United States 30(8)

Daniel C. Richman, Old Chief v. United States: Stipulating away Prosecutorial Accountability? 38(1)

Problem 2.1 38(1)

Conditional Relevance 38(5)

Edmund M. Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence 39(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 104(b) 40(1)

State v. McNeely 40(2)

Vaughn C. Ball, The Myth of Conditional Relevance 42(1)

Problem 2.2 42(1)

Hearsay 43(212)

The Hearsay Rule and Its Rationale 43(28)

Introduction 43(1)

Trial of Sir Walter Raleigh, Knight for High Treason, By a Special Commission of Oyer and Terminer, at Winchester, 17th November, 1603, 2 James I 44(2)

Leake v. Hagert 46(2)

McCormick on Evidence 48(1)

Laurence H. Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay 49(2)

Problem 3.1 51(1)

Nonhearsay Uses of Out-of-Court Statements 51(2)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 801(c) 53(1)

Lyons Partnership v. Morris Constumes, Inc. 53(1)

United States v. Parry 54(1)

Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor 55(1)

Southerland v. Sycamore Community School District 56(1)

United States v. Jonson 57(1)

United states v. Jefferson 58(1)

United States v. Saavedra 58(1)

Hanson v. Johnson 59(1)

Creaghe v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co. 60(1)

United States v. Montana 61(1)

Problems 3.2-3.11 61(1)

Implied Assertions 62(1)

United States v. Zenni 63(3)

State v. Dullard 66(4)

Laurence H. Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay 70(1)

Problems 3.12-3.17 70(1)

Hearsay and Confrontation 71(19)

Crawford v. Washington 73(8)

Davis v. Washington 81(8)

Problems 3.18-3.20 89(1)

Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule 90(1)

Laurence H. Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay 90(1)

Advisory Committee Note to Article VIII of the F.R.E. 90(46)

Prior Statements by Witnesses 91(1)

Albet v. McKay & Co 92(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 801(d)(I) 93(1)

Report of the Senate Judiciary Committee 94(1)

Report of the Conference Committee 95(1)

Repot of the Senate Judiciary Committee 95(1)

United States v. Owens 96(1)

Problems 3.21-3.25 97(1)

Admissions by Party-Opponents 98(1)

Direct Admissions 99(1)

Generally 99(1)

Salvitti v. Throppe 99(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 801(d)(2) 99(1)

Edmund Morgan, Admissions 100(1)

United States v. McGee 100(1)

McCormick on Evidence 101(1)

United States v. Phelps 101(1)

Admissions and Multiple Hearsay 102(1)

Reed v. McCord 102(1)

Foster v. Commissione of Internal Revenue 103(1)

Stephen A. Saltzburg, Michael M. Martin & Daniel J. Capra, Federal Rules of Evidence Manual 103(1)

Admissions and Completeness 104(1)

Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey 104(2)

Problems 3.26 & 3.27 106(1)

Adoptive Admissions 107(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 801(d)(2)(B) 107(1)

United States v. Fortes 107(2)

Southern Stone Co. v. Singer 109(1)

Authorized Admissions 110(1)

Hanson v. Waller 110(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 801(d)(2)(C) 111(1)

Problem 3.28 112(1)

Agent and Employee Admissions 112(1)

Advisory Committe Note to F.R.E 801(d)(2)(D) 112(1)

Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc. 112(4)

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Lozen International, LLC 116(1)

Problem 3.29-3.31 117(1)

Co-Conspirator Admissions 117(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 801 (d)(2)(E) 117(1)

Report of the Senate Judiciary Committee 117(1)

Joseph H. Levie, Hearsay and Conspiracy 118(1)

Bourjaily V. United States 118(6)

Advisory Committee Note to 1997 Amendment to F.R.E. 801 (d)(2) 124(1)

Problem 3.32 124(1)

Admissions and the Bruton Rule 124(1)

Bruton v. United States 125(5)

Gray v. Maryland 130(6)

Spontaneous and Contemporaneous Statements 136(8)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803 136(2)

United States v. Obayagbona 138(2)

Bemis v. Edwards 140(1)

United States v. Elem 141(1)

Graham C. Lilly, An Introduction to the Law of Evidence 142(1)

Robert M. Hutchins & Donald Slesinger, Some Observations on the Law of Evidence 143(1)

The Present-Sense Impression Exception to the Rule against Hearsay: Origins and Attributes 144(1)

Jon R. Waltz

Problem 3.33 & 3.34 144(1)

State of Mind 144(14)

Generally 144(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(3) 145(1)

Unitd States v. Harris 145(2)

The Hillmon Doctrine 147(1)

Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hillmon 147(4)

The Case of the Anonymous Corpse 151(1)

Brooks W. MacCracken

Shepard v. United States 151(3)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(3) 154(1)

Report of the House Judiciary Committee 155(1)

United States v. Houliban 155(2)

Problem 3.35-3.37 157(1)

Injury Reports 158(6)

Advisory Committe Note to F.R.E. 803(4) 158(1)

Rock v. Huffco Gas & Oil Co. 159(2)

State v. Moses 161(2)

Testing the Testimonial Concept and Excerptions to Confrontation: ``A Little Child Shall Lead Them'' 163(1)

Robert P. Mosteller

Problems 3.38 & 3.39 164(1)

Recorded Recollection 164(8)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(5) 165(1)

Fisher v. Swartz 166(2)

United States v. Riccardi 168(4)

Problem 3.40 172(1)

Business Records 172(13)

Genrally 173(1)

Advisor Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(b) 173(1)

State v. Acquisto 173(2)

Advisory Committe Note to the 2000 Amendment to F.R.E. 803(6) 175(1)

Qualifying ``Businesses'' 176(1)

Report of the House Judiciary Committee 176(1)

Report of the Conference Committee 176(1)

Keogh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 176(2)

United States v. Gibson 178(1)

Qualifying Records 179(1)

Palmer v. Hoffman 179(1)

Lewis v. Baker 180(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(6) 181(2)

Sources of Information 183(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(6) 183(1)

Wilson v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. 183(1)

Absence of Record 184

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(7) 174(11)

United States v. Gentry 185(1)

Problem 3.41 185(1)

Public Records 185(18)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(8) 186(1)

Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey 187(5)

United States v. Oates 192(4)

United States v. Brown 196(1)

United States v. Orozco 197(2)

State v. Forte 199(2)

Hinojos-Mendoza v. People 201(2)

Former Testimony 203(12)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 804 204(1)

Evidence Law 205(1)

Roger C. Park

David P. Leonard

Steven H. Goldberg

United States v. Bollin 205(1)

Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. 206(2)

Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 208(2)

Glen Weissenberger, The Former Testimony Hearsay Exception: A Study in Rulemaking, Judicial Revisionism, and the Separation of Powers 210(1)

United States v. Salerno 210(4)

Problems 3.42 & 3.43 214(1)

Dying Declarations 215(7)

McCormick on Evidence 215(1)

Shepard v. United States 215(2)

United States v. Sacasas 217(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 804(b)(2) 218(1)

Report of the House Judiciary Committee 218(1)

State v. Lewis 219(2)

Problem 3.44 221(1)

Declarations Against Interest 222(6)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 804(b)(3) 222(1)

Report of the House Judiciary Committee 223(1)

United States v. Duran Samaniego 223(2)

United States v. Jackson 225(2)

Problems 3.45 & 3.46 227(1)

Forfeiture by Wrongdoing 228(6)

Advisory Committee Note to 1997 Amendment to F.R.E. 804 228(1)

Giles v. California 228(6)

Residual Exception 234(4)

Advisory Committee Note to Rule 807 234(1)

Federal Rules of Evidence 234(1)

Glen Weissenberger

James J. Duane

United States v. Laster 235(3)

The Residual Exception to the Hearsay Rule: The Complete Tratment 238(1)

G. Michael Fenner

Review 238(4)

Problems from the Multistate Bar Examination (3.47-3.72) 238(4)

C. Hearsay and Due Process 242(13)

Chambers v. Mississippi 243(8)

Fortini v. Murphy 251(4)

Character Evidence 255(66)

The Basic Rule and Its Exceptions 255(8)

People v. Zackowitz 256(3)

Cleghorn v. New York Central & Hudson River R.R. Co. 259(1)

Berryhill v. Berryhill 260(1)

Larson v. Klapprodt 260(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 404(a) 261(1)

McCormick on Evidence 262(1)

Problems 4.1-4.5 262(1)

Methods of Proving Character 263(10)

Michelson v. United States 263(5)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 405 268(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 803(21) 269(1)

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Roldan 269(1)

United States v. Krapp 270(2)

United States v. Setien 272(1)

McCormick on Evidence 272(1)

Problems 4.6-4.8 273(1)

Other Uses of Specific Conduct 273(18)

Permissible Purposes 274(1)

United States v. Beechum 274(2)

United States v. Boyd 276(1)

United States v. DeJohn 277(1)

Lewis v. United States 278(1)

United States v. Crocker 278(1)

United States v. Dossey 279(1)

United States v. Wright 280(2)

Advisory Committee Note to 1991 Amendment to F.R.E. 404 282(1)

The Use of Evidence of an Accused's Uncharged Misconduct to Prove Mens Rea: The Doctrines Which Threaten to Engulf the Character Evidence Prohibition 283(1)

Edward J. Imwinkelried

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): The Fictitious Ban on Character Reasoning From Other Crime Evidence 283(1)

Andrew J. Morris

Intellectual Coherence in an Evidence Code 284(1)

Paul F. Rothstein

The Prejudice Against Similar Fact Evidence 285(1)

Mirko Bagaric

Kumar Amarasekara

Requisite Proof 286(1)

Huddleston v. United States 286(4)

Problems 4.9 & 4.10 290(1)

Character and Habit 291(8)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E 406 291(2)

Report of the House Judiciary Committee 293(1)

Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 293(2)

Burchett v. Commonwealth 295(3)

The Theory of Discretion in the Federal Rules of Evidence 298(1)

Thomas M. Mengler

Problem 4.11 299(1)

Sexual Assault and Child Molestation 299(11)

Character of the Victim 300(1)

A Treastise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law 300(1)

John Henry Wigmore

Grahan v. State 301(1)

Remarks of Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman 302(1)

Advisory Committee Note to 1994 Amendments to Rule 412 302(3)

United States v. Saunders 305(2)

Olden v. Kentucky 307(3)

Character of the Defendant 310(11)

Remarks of Rep. Susan Molinari 311(2)

Report of the Judicial Conference of the United States on the Admission of Character Evidence in Certain Sexual Misconduct Cases 313(1)

Federal Rules of Evidence Manual 314(1)

Steven A. Saltzburg

Michael M. Martin

Daniel J. Capra

United States v. LeCompte 314(2)

The New Federal Rules of Evidence on Prior Acts of Accused Sex Offenders: A Poorly Drafted Version of a Very Bad Idea 316(1)

James Joseph Duane

No Bad Men! A Feminist Analysis of Character Evidence in Rape Trials 316(1)

Aviva Orenstein

The Crime Bill of 1994 and the Law of Character Evidence: Congress Was Right About Consent Defense Cases 317(2)

Roger C. Park

United States v. Cunningham 319(2)

Other Forbidden Inferences 321(22)

Subsequent Remedial Measures 322(3)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 407 322(1)

Clausen v. Storage Tank Development Corp. 323(1)

In re Asbestos Litigation 324(1)

Settlement Efforts 325(11)

Civil Cases 325(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 408 325(1)

Ramada Development Co. v. Rauch 326(2)

Carney v. American University 328(1)

Criminal Cases 329(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 410 329(1)

United States v. Mezzanatto 330(5)

The Story of Rule 410 and United States v. Mezzanatto: Using Plea Statements at Trial 335(1)

Christolpher Slobogin

Consensual Modifications of the Rules of Evidence: The Limits of Party Autonomy in an Adversary System 335(1)

John W. Strong

Medical Payments and Liability Insurance 336(7)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 409 336(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 411 337(1)

Charter v. Chleborad 337(1)

Higgins v. Hicks Co. 338(1)

Charles Alan Wright & Kenneth W. Graham, Jr. 339(1)

Problems 5.1-5.4 340(3)

Trial Mechanics 343(26)

Order of Proof 344(5)

Generally 344(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 611 344(1)

Evidence Law 344(1)

Robert C. Park

David P. Leonard

Steven H. Goldberg

Stone v. Peacock 345(1)

Elabri v. Lekas 345(1)

United States v. Wilford 346(1)

United States v. Carter 347(1)

Rule of Completeness 348(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 106 348(1)

Federal Rules of Evidence Manual 349(1)

Stephen A. Saltzburg

Michael M. Martin

Daniel J. Capra

Mode of Questioning 349(4)

Advisory Committee Note of F.R.E. 611 350(1)

United States v. Nabors 350(1)

Ellis v. City of Chicago 351(2)

Problems 6.1-6.3 353(1)

Sequestering Witnesses 353(2)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 615 354(1)

Report of the Senate Judiciary Committee 354(1)

United States v. Machor 354(1)

Questioning by Judge 355(6)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 614 356(1)

United States v. Tilghman 356(5)

Questioning by Jurors 361(8)

United States v. Hernandez 361(3)

State v. Fisher 364(5)

Impeachment And Rehabilitation 369(66)

Introduction 369(2)

McCormick on Evidence 370(1)

Character for Untruthfulness 371(6)

In General 372(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 608 372(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 610 372(1)

United States v. Lollar 373(1)

United States v. Rosa 374(1)

United States v. Ling 374(2)

United States v. White 376(1)

United States v. Aponte 376(1)

Problems 7.1-7.4 377(1)

Prior Criminal Convictions 377(12)

Admissible and Inadmissible Convictions 378(1)

United States v. Wong 378(2)

United States v. Amaechi 380(1)

United States v. Sanders 381(2)

United States v. Oaxaca 383(1)

United States v. Hernandez 384(1)

Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality and Situation 385(1)

Richard D. Friedman

Preserving Claims of Error 385(1)

Luce v. United States 385(2)

Ohler v. United States 387(1)

Problem 7.5 & 7.6 388(1)

Prior Inconsistent Statements 389(9)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 613 389(1)

United States v. Lebel 390(1)

United States v. Dennis 391(1)

United States v. Ince 392(3)

United States v. Webster 395(1)

People v. Freeman 396(2)

Problems 7.7-7.10 398(1)

Bias and Incapacity 398(7)

United States v. Abel 399(1)

United States v. Sasso 399(5)

Henderson v. Detella 404(1)

Specific Contradiction 405(8)

Simmouns, Inc. v. Pinkerton's Inc 406(3)

United States v. Copelin 409(2)

Reforming Extrinsic Impeachment 411(1)

Kevin C. McMunigal

Calvin William Sharpe

Problems 7.11 & 7.12 412(1)

Rehabilitation 413(22)

In General 414(1)

United States v. Lindemann 414(2)

Character for Truthfulness 416(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 608 416(1)

Beard v. Mitchell 417(1)

United States v. Danehy 417(1)

United States v. Drury 418(1)

United States v. Murray 419(2)

Problems 7.13 & 7.14 421(1)

Prior Consistent Statements 422(1)

Tome v. United States 422(10)

United States v. Simonelli 432(2)

Problem 7.15 434(1)

Competence 435(42)

In General 435(5)

Select Cases on Evidence at the Common Law 436(1)

James B. Thayer

Rosen v. United States 437(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 601 438(1)

United States v. Lightly 439(1)

Personal Knowledge 440(3)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 602 441(1)

United States v. Hickey 441(2)

Oath or Affirmation 443(6)

United States v. Ward 443(3)

United States v. Allen J. 446(2)

Victor Gold Do the Federal Rules of Evidence Matter? 448(1)

Problem 8.1-8.3 449(1)

Dead Man Statutes 449(3)

Report of the House Judiciary Committee 450(1)

McCormick on Evidence 450(1)

Alabama Code §12-21-163 451(1)

California Evidence Code §1261 452(1)

Competence and the Constitution 452(7)

Rock v. Arkansas 452(6)

Problem 8.4 458(1)

Judges, Jurors, and Lawyers 459(18)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 605 459(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 606 460(1)

Tanner v. United States 461(8)

People v. Fleiss 469(4)

United States v. Ewing 473(2)

Problems 8.5-8.7 475(2)

Opinions, Experts, And Scientific Evidence 477(124)

Lay Opinons 477(10)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 701 478(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 704 478(1)

United States v. Meling 479(1)

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Knight 479(2)

Robinson v. Bump 481(1)

Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendment to F.R.E. 701 481(1)

United States v. Peoples 482(2)

United States v. Avala-Pizarro 484(3)

Expert Testimony 487(26)

Permissible Subjects and Scope 488(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 702 488(1)

Hatch v. State Farm Five & Casualty Co. 488(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 703 489(1)

Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendment to F.R.E. 703 490(1)

State v. Lewis 490(2)

Report of the Senate Judiciary Committee 492(1)

Reliability 493(1)

Court-Appointed Experts 493(1)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 706 493(1)

LeBlance v. PNS Stores, Inc. 493(1)

Taming Patent: Six Steps for Surviving Scary Patent Cases 494(1)

John Shepard Wiley Jr.

Judicial Screening of Party-Approved Experts 495(1)

Introduction 495(1)

The Daubert Revolution 496(1)

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 496(7)

General Electric Co. v. Joiner 503(3)

Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael 506(7)

The Current Legal Landscape 513(4)

Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendment to F.R.E. 702 513(1)

Eleanor Swift, One Hundred Years of Evidence Law Reform: Thayer's Triuph 513(1)

How Good Is Good Enough? Expert Evidence Under Daubert and Kumho 514(1)

David L. Faigman

David H. Kaye

Michael J. Sake

Joseph Sanders

``E'' Is for Eclectic: Multiple Perspectiveson Evidence 514(1)

Richard D. Friedman

Marsh v. Valyou 515(2)

Problem 9.1 517(1)

Current Controversies in Scienctific Evidence 517(84)

Lie Detection 518(1)

State v. Porter 518(11)

United States v. Scheffer 529(5)

Problem 9.2 534(1)

Social Science Evidence 535(1)

United States v. Smithers 535(5)

State v. Coley 540(3)

State v. Kinney 543(4)

Navigating Expert Reliability: Are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock? 547(1)

D. Michael Risinger

Doubts About Daubert: Psychiatric Anecdata as a Case Study 548(1)

Christopher Slobogin

Probabilistic Evidence 549(1)

A Probability Primer 549(4)

``Trial by Mathematics'' 553(1)

People v. Collins 553(5)

Evidence Scholarship Old and New 558(1)

Roger C. Park

State v. Spann 559(8)

United States v. Veysey 567(3)

Problem 9.3 570(1)

DNA Testing 571(1)

DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers 571(1)

Jonathan J. Koehler

United States v. Shea 572(11)

On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios, and Error Rates 583(3)

Jonathan J. Koehler

The New Forensics: Criminal Justice, False Certainty, and the Second Generation of Scientific Evidence 586(2)

Erin Murphy

Traditional Forensic Science 588(1)

What DNA ``Fingerprinting'' Can Teach the Law About the Rest of Forensic Science 588(1)

Michael J. Saks

Jonathan J. Koehler

United States v. Fujii 588(2)

Banishing Ipse Dixit: The Impact of Kumho Tire on Forensic Identification Science 590(1)

Michael J. Saks

Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification 591(7)

Simon A. Cole

Judge Bars Use of Fingerprints in Murder Trial 598(1)

Jennifer McMenamin

Comparative Law Without Leaving Home: What Civil Procedure Can Teach Criminal Procedure, and Vice Versa 599(2)

David A. Sklansky

Stephen C. Yeazell

Privileges 601(74)

In General 601(3)

McCormick on Evidence 602(1)

Evidence 603(1)

Christopher B. Mueller

Laird C. Kirkpatrick

Attorney-Client Privilege 604(51)

Introduction 604(1)

Swidler & Berlin v. United States 604(4)

Rationale of Judicial Evidence 608(1)

Jeremy Bentham

The Kaye, Scholer Affair: The Lawyer's Duty of Candor and the Bar's Temptations of Evasion and Apology 609(1)

William H. Simon

Do Judges Systematically Favor the Interests of the Legal Profession? 610(1)

Benjamin H. Barton

Elements of the Privilege 610(1)

Communication 611(1)

United States v. Kendrick 611(1)

Tornay v. United States 612(1)

In Confidence 613(1)

United States v. Gann 613(1)

United States v. Evans 614(1)

United States v. Lawless 615(1)

Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp. 616(1)

Between Attorney and Client 617(1)

United States v. Kovel 617(2)

United States v. McPartlin 619(2)

Pasteris v. Robillard 621(1)

Upjohn Co. v. United States 622(7)

To Facilitate Legal Service 629(1)

Hughes v. Meade 629(1)

United States v. Davis 630(1)

United States v. Rowe 631(2)

Problems 10.1-10.6 633(1)

Waiver 634(1)

United States v. Bernard 634(1)

Tasby v. United States 635(1)

Hollins v. Powell 636(1)

In re von Bulow 637(4)

Christopher B. Mueller & Laird C. Kirkpatrick, Evidence 641(1)

Crime-Fraud Exception 641(1)

United States v. Zolin 642(5)

Spousal Privileges 647(1)

Trammel v. United States 647(7)

Problems 10.7 & 10.8 654(1)

Other Privileges 655(20)

McCormick on Evidence 655(2)

Jaffee v. Redmond 657(10)

In re Grand Jury 667(6)

Evidence Law Adrift 673(2)

Mirjan R. Damaska

Physical Evidence 675(32)

Authentication 676(6)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 901 676(1)

United States v. Long 677(1)

Bruther v. General Electric Co. 678(2)

United States v. Casto 680(1)

United States v. Grant 680(1)

Problems 11.1 & 11.2 681(1)

The Best Evidence Rule 682(14)

Scope and Purpose 682(1)

Historical Foundations of the Law of Evidence: A View from the Ryder Sources 682(1)

John H. Langbein

Meyers v. United States 683(2)

Advisory Committee Notes to F.R.E. 1001-1002 685(1)

United States v. Gonzales-Benitez 686(1)

The Best Evidence Principle 687(1)

Dale A. Nance

Exceptions 688(1)

Advisory Committee Notes to F.R.E. 1003-1008 688(1)

United States v. Stockton 689(1)

United States v. Standing Soldier 690(1)

Seiler v. Lucasfilm, Ltd. 691(4)

Problems 11.3-11.5 695(1)

Demonstrative Evidence 696(11)

McCormick on Evidence 697(1)

The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy 697(2)

Jennifer L. Mnookin

United States v. Weeks 699(1)

United States v. Humphrey 699(1)

Roland v. Langlois 700(1)

United States v. Wood 701(1)

Bannister v. Town of Noble, Oklahoma 702(2)

The Derivative Use of Demonstrative Evidence: Charting Its Proper Evidentiary Status 704(3)

Robert D. Brain

Daniel J. Broderick

Burdens, Presumptions, and Judicial Notice 707(36)

Burdens and Presumptions in Civil Cases 707(8)

In re Yoder Co. 708(4)

Law Revision Commission Comment to California Evidence Code §601 712(1)

Christopher B. Mueller & Larid C. Kirkpatrick, Evidence 713(1)

Problem 12.1-12.3 714(1)

Burdens and Presumptions in Criminal Cases 715(15)

Patterson v. New York 715(6)

County Court of Ulster County v. Allen 721(5)

Sandstrom v. Montana 726(4)

Problems 12.4 & 12.5 730(1)

Judicial Notice 730(13)

Advisory Committee Note to F.R.E. 201 732(2)

United States v. Gould 734(2)

United States v. Lewis 736(2)

Carley v. Wheeled Coach 738(1)

United States v. Bowers 739(1)

United States v. Bello 739(2)

Problems 12.6-12.10 741(2)
Table of Cases 743(8)
Table of Rules, Statutes, and Constitutional Provisions 751(6)
Index 757