Summary: Publisher Summary 1 After assuring readers that she is not about to compare anything to anything else, or to propose a new model for comparative analysis, Melas (comparative literature, Cornell U.) examines various instances of post-colonial comparison by analyzing figures of incommensurability in a set of literary and theoretical texts. She views post- coloniality as a condition linked to the cultural logic subtending the history of European conquests begun 500 years ago that brought the world as an empirical totality into human apprehension. Annotation 漏2007 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)   Publisher Summary 2 This book is about culture and comparison. Starting with the history of the discipline of comparative literature and its forgotten relation to the positivist comparative method, it inquires into the idea of comparison in a postcolonial world. Comparison was Eurocentric by exclusion when it applied only to European literature, and Eurocentric by discrimination when it adapted evolutionary models to place European literature at the forefront of human development. This book argues that inclusiveness is not a sufficient response to postcolonial and multiculturalist challenges because it leaves the basis of equivalence unquestioned. The point is not simply to bring more objects under comparison, but rather to examine the process of comparison. The book offers a new approach to the either/or of relativism and universalism, in which comparison is either impossible or assimilatory, by focusing instead on various forms of “incommensurability”—comparisons in which there is a ground for comparison but no basis for equivalence. Each chapter develops a particular form of such cultural comparison from readings of important novelists (Joseph Conrad, Simone Schwartz-Bart), poets (Aimé Césaire, Derek Walcott), and theorists (Edouard Glissant, Jean-Luc Nancy).